Editorial Policy

Our health and supplement coverage uses a conservative evidence standard because digestive symptoms and supplement decisions can affect health.

Source hierarchy

We prefer government health agencies, systematic reviews, peer-reviewed research and primary product labels for factual claims. Seller pages are used to describe what a product claims or offers—not to prove effectiveness.

Product claims

We separate (1) seller claims, (2) label facts, (3) ingredient-level evidence and (4) finished-product evidence. We do not present one level as another.

No fake experience

We do not claim that our editorial desk personally used a supplement unless genuine documented testing occurred. We do not invent testimonials, ratings, clinical results or guarantees.

Commercial facts

Prices, packages and refund terms can change. We date our reviews and direct readers to the live checkout for current transaction terms.

Medical boundaries

Our content is educational and does not diagnose, prescribe or replace professional care. Red-flag symptoms receive explicit escalation language.

Corrections

Material corrections should update the affected page and its review date. Conflicting seller information is disclosed rather than silently harmonized.